![]() Report: Biggest Election Fraud in History Discovered! [VIDEO] BEV HARRIS: How America's Elections Are Hacked [VIDEOS] Transcript of the Alex Jones interview with Bev Harris ![]() ![]() Patriotic Heroes Bennie Smith & Bev Harris Bennie Smith & Bev Harris explain the banal evil of electronic election fraud.. Bennie Smith: Votes being counted as money... Bev Harris: So the master computer can divide whole vote up into fractions, and we'll see what that can do to an election... Bennie Smith: This thing becomes God to determine who the sheriff will always be, who the district attorney will always be, who the mayor will always be. The contract signing authority belongs to whoever I decide the winner is going to be." FRACTION MAGIC - DETAIL VERSION There are things we can do... What can we do about this? Conceptual Framework: IT'S ABOUT EVIDENCE not "confidence" "Procedures" are not the same thing as evidence. It's about Freedom of information not "computer security" Public Policy: Must have paper ballots. Ballots must include public right to inspect. Use voting systems which take pics of every ballot. [already available] Pics of ballots ["ballot images"] must be made available for public inspection promptly Public must be able to match serial number on ballot image to actual ballot images to actual ballots to compare Short Term Actions: As for copies of ballot images. Ask to inspect ballots. Central tabulator is at county elections office. Observe it. Have camera. Precinct voting machines should print results tape. Compare with stated result. Observe spot checks - detect, blow the whistle on sham 'audits'. Q: Does Fraction Magic always use a USB? A: No. It can also be on the computer or use remote access Q: Who is in a position to do Fraction Magic? A: IT guys. Vendors. Some ballot printers. Consultants. Technicians. Q: How can someone get access to multiple locations? A: More like "who." Election service providers. Vendors. Subcontractors. Q: Why would someone do Fraction Magic? A: Contract signing authority. Pay to play. Billions of $$ in local appropriations. Q: Why is it in there? A: Programmer e-mails say fractional counts are in there to enable "weighted races" Q: Who put it there? A: According to programmers and court testimony: a convicted felon; 23 counts on previous computer crimes. Q: Name? A: Jeffrey W. Dean. Previously employed by Bud Krogh, the former head of White House Plumbers unit under Richard Nixon. Jeffrey Dean put some other stuff in there too. It is not over. Stand up. Let's make it right. VIDEO ![]() ![]() DOCUMENTARY: HACKING DEMOCRACY PLEASE SHARE THESE LINKS WIDELY: * http://www.blackboxvoting.org * http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/ * http://www.infowars.com/how-americas-elections-are-hacked/ * http://www.infowars.com/live-now-biggest-election-fraud-in-history-discovered/ https://astrologicaltools.com/trumplandslide MORE LINKS & STORIES ON ELECTION FRAUD |
![]() Transcript of the Alex Jones interview with Bev Harris BEV HARRIS: Yeah, it tells you how to do everything. We found some information, and I think it's the missing piece that we didn't have before. A gentleman by the name of Benny Smith, out of Memphis Tennessee discovered what I would characterize as a master key, which essentially lets one person control invisibly and with remarkable precision, down to the precinct level and down to the type of voting, early voting and so forth, whatever type they want, many different locations at once, multiple counties and multiple states. It has actually been in the system since---it [was] put in the system in 2001, but it came into wide use in 2006, but it kind of took someone with a special set of skills to know what to look for. He didn't just do like most of the people did, where he says "well let me just look at the program and see what I think", he is a guy who has some background in political forecasting and so forth, and he knew what would be needed. He kind of went "Let me design what I think would be needed in order to succeed with widespread election fraud." And after he did that he went "Now let me see if the pieces that I know are necessary are built into the system - they should not be." And he was amazed when he found, after looking at the files, that the pieces were built in to commit very large-scale fraud using a feature that had been very little known before. Well you know, the thing that he felt was needed, which I didn't really understand until I met him and actually started putting together this video, he said the one thing you need, the key element, is you need to have the votes counted as fractions. You need the votes to be counted with decimal places, like you count money. You have to have--not just--if a vote is a dollar, you also have to have cents on the end of it, it's like 16,000.31, right? Why do you need--now, that will not show, it's hidden, but you need that because--he said, you know, there's one thing you don't know, you can't know, before the election, and that's how many people will show up at each polling place in each precinct. So if you start doing things, like I'm going to do every third vote or I'm gonna add a hundred votes here, you're not gonna be very precise. Instead, you need to do what in finance they call 'an allocation'. You say "whatever number of people show up, the guy's gonna get X % of those votes, whatever they are." Now think about this.. if you have a hundred votes, and you say "My guy's gonna get 43%, that's 43 votes. But if you have 99 people show up, what's gonna happen? You're gonna end up with 42 point something something something votes. So if your system is not capable of counting votes with decimals, it can't do that allocation. And so what he did was, he knew that that's how it would have to be done and it would have to be very specific, down to the precinct level--the databases can be configured any way you want, and they should be configured and used to be configured to count each vote as a whole number - it's called counting it as an integer. He went in and looked and said "let me see, it should count it as a whole integer.." They had changed the setting in all of the voting machines in America. AJ: Oh! BH: Now this is the master computers, this is not the machines out in the precincts, this is the master computers that control all the voting machines they have in the counties. AJ: Bev, Bev, this is incredible! Again, time and time again you and your researchers tirelessly around the country have exposed the different ways they're doing it. And so I guess as a top fraud investigator you're able to reverse engineer, "okay if we are going to steal it, how will we do it? Let's look for this..." And then sure enough you've caught them dialing in remotely, you've caught them... BH: It's amazing, yeah. You know if you--in other words, anybody can sit there and go "well this looks like a vulnerability, theoretically." This is not a theory, this is real. This is something that was put into the system, they actually changed the setting.. we can actually go back and figure out, now that we know it, exactly the date that the setting was changed, and that it migrated to all the other manufacturers in the U.S. So now, at this point, the setting is in there to be able to allocate votes by percent, and basically 99% of the votes in the U.S. And then he went on and he basically proved it. He said "Now that I know that's in there, I think I can allocate the votes." And it is stunning when you see the demo. AJ: Let's be clear let's be clear, you're [unintelligible] to the voting software, you go in, it's this algorithm or system to be able to basically program it to show the outcome you want by shaving votes. I mean you know a layperson who's not an expert like you or a top computer programmer, what's happening? BH: So there's this one central computer which at the end of the day all the votes come to it. That's where you take it--you don't run around to 5000 different things in precincts, you wait til the votes come to you and then you have your way with them. And it's very very precise, it's invisible, and there's abso--it doesn't matter whether the system's on the internet or not, none of the stuff that they say is a protection matters at all. You have your way with them. Then once you control the votes in whatever way you want for whatever target you want, this can be done by one or a couple of people across whole jurisdictions. I actually didn't want to write the story unless I was absolutely sure. So not only did I see him do it, but I had him show me how it was done. And I took some vote databases, real vote databases that I have, one of them was the entire state of Alaska, the vote database from the 2004 election. I was able to change every precinct in the state of Alaska in four seconds. AJ: Is it not clear that Hillary and the media are trying to sell the idea that there isn't election fraud and that Trump's gonna lose by a landslide when the polls and everything else shows something opposite? BH: Let me put it this way--of course things have been very surprising of late, but if she is still viable in any way, whether or not she wins, she will win. AJ: Wow. Please say that again? BH: Whether or not she wins, she will win. Now, she may be removed from office afterwards, and you may recall Richard Nixon was right in the middle of, it had been four months into Watergate scandals and was reelected and removed from office later. But what's so disturbing about that is, you know there's actually some republican elites who might prefer getting her in and removing her from office, rather than having someone they can't control... AJ: Of course of course. Exactly, exactly! The whole power structure is against Trump, I mean whether he's perfect or good or bad.. I mean we claim we're against the corrupt power structure, then how could we not be for Trump? I mean, I'm sorry. BH: I'll say this as well.. whatever anyone thinks about the candidate, I will say that when he has brought to the front the issue of tampering with elections, it's one of the most important services that could have been done in the United States, ever. AJ: You're the expert - what headline do we pout on this, Bev? BH: Ahh, you're gonna have to choose the headline [laughs] AJ: No, I just want to be totally accurate, vote fraud expert Bev Harris exposes, you know, the big enchilada or, I mean... BH: You know I just call it the Magic Key. I mean it really literally is. You picture a janitor going down the hall with a master key jingling at his side, he can open any door with it, there you go. You know we've basically got the Magic Key. AJ: So you have found the motherlode of election fraud? BH: Yeah, it tells you how to do everything. And, you know, you really can see it depicted. And it's just... AJ: And I know you want to give this fella credit, and we are in a moment and I want to get him on and you... BH: Yeah... AJ: And you back on, please please, please? I've wanted you on for months, you've been quietly working on this. Briefly though.. George Soros, 16 states, his company, he's connected to others, he's been caught in a lot of stuff.. what do you make of that? BH: Yeah, I have seen some indicators.. Now there's a company called Dominion, there has been some mistakes, where people thought that Smartmatic was being used. No, Smartmatic hasn't been used here, it's been used in Latin America and a bunch of other places. But he's connected, I think--it's kind of through a couple of hoops, but with a company called Dominion. And Dominion is one of the ones that bought the premier Diebold stuff, and they have now admitted that they fractionalized the count. AJ: WHOAH! BH: mmm-hmm AJ: So a Soros-connected group BH: Again, it's--you know, it's sort of connected through a couple of arms lengths, but it's enough so that I wouldn’t call--I think there is some connection--it's just umm, it's like one of his guys' guys. No, I mean there's always going to be a couple of buffers in-between... AJ: A Soros-connected group, it looks like maybe admitting to be involved in the whole fraction deal. WOW. BH: Oh they, yeah they have. One of their top guys said that they did it. There's a, person, there's a group called Defend the Vote in Illinois, and the woman involved with that, Sharon Mulroney, actually confronted Dominion and they admitted that they do fractionalize the count and she asked them why and they said "For marketing purposes." [chuckles] AJ: WOW. They hide it in plain view. |